You are viewing [info]thumpaflash's journal

 
 
25 November 2009 @ 09:36 am
Oh My..The Deaf and Other Consumers Get Bent Over Again by Hollywood..  
Well folks, you knew it was bound to happen somehow, someway...

The Hollywood studios, in an effort to maximize their profits yearly, have always advocated a quicker release to DVD for sale of their movies. Theaters, in an effort to protect THEIR businesses (at least in the past before flat fees became more standard), advocated keeping movies in theaters a little longer and delaying release to retail or rental market. Generally speaking, the "release window" as it is called, is somewhere in the neighborhood of 4.5 months. What does this mean? Simply put, you generally have to wait about four and a half months after a movie is released in theaters before it will be available for rent or purchase (sometimes longer).

Why does this matter to the deaf and hard of hearing? Well, obviously, we have been a big source of the uptick in rental services such as Netflix, Redbox, and so on due to a lack of good access to captioned movies in the theaters. If I only had a nickel for everytime someone told me "Well, I just wait for it to go to DVD and rent it", I'd not only be a very wealthy man, I'd probably have my OWN theater (fully accessible, of course).

Captioned movie access arguments and rental "bonus features" fiascos notwithstanding, there has long been a happy, if not somewhat tenous, middle ground reached with the current "release window". While the deaf and hard of hearing often feel slighted for having to wait that long for access to captioned versions of hit movies and movies they want to see, they've been able to somewhat live with it. Movie theaters make their money, Hollywood studios make theirs, everyone is happy, right?

Not so fast, pardner! According to the article at this link:
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/oct/23/business/fi-ct-dvd23

Hollywood, distraught over losing one more penny than they have to to rental companies, are considering creating a NEW "Rental only" release window, delaying the release to rental companies such as Netflix and Redbox by a few MORE weeks, in hopes that it will push people to BUY more DVD's at retail (and therefore HIGHER PROFITS FOR THEM) than rent them.

Let's see, they sell them, and make money. They sell them to rental companies...and make money (not to mention, it is still THEIR product being viewed)....But because their retail DVD sales are down, they want to possibly make us consumers WAIT EVEN LONGER TO RENT...

Astounding, just astounding, the amount of greed that pervades that industry. Instead of being creative and making up for retail DVD sales drops through innovative licensing of products, perhaps decreasing the amount spent on marketing (I mean, seriously, a $50,000 a year lackey can generate a HUGE marketing presence in today's internet age), and so forth and so on, they are hoping to basically FORCE us to either buy, or wait a little longer to rent. I mean, after all, what's 4.5 months, right? If the deaf, hard of hearing, and the other consumers are willing to wait THAT long, surely they can wait a little longer (for those of you humor-challenged readers, that was SARCASM on my part).

*SIGH* Why do I feel like banging my head on my desk? Just when they begin to show a LICK of common sense (such as their quick reaction to the outrage of captions not being on "Up" rental versions, however laughable the excuse was for it happening in the first place), they go and pull another bone-headed stunt like this.

They are hoping to get the rental companies to go along with this by perhaps dropping the price they charge them to purchase movies to rent because, if successful, this new release window they are discussing will decrease rentals and hurt the bottom line of companies like Netflix and Redbox. Same old "in the box" thinking that has typified the corporate structures of Hollywood studios for years now.

Hey fellas, here is a free suggestion from me to you... Why don't you try to GROW your market some by offering more Open Captioned movies in areas underserved in that category? That's a start, at least. Or even better yet, work with your exhibitor partners (theaters) and help make it easier and cheaper to offer captions in the theaters instead of squeezing them for more money with heavy-handed tactics such as the tacit collusion to shift to all digital and forcing them to shoulder the heavier end of the burden while YOUR profits grow even more from this conversion than THEIRS do?

And so it goes...fight another day folks. I hope all my great readers have a wonderful and safe Thanksgiving break with their loved ones.

Eddie
 
 
( 10 comments — Leave a comment )
(Anonymous) on November 25th, 2009 07:52 pm (UTC)
It seems that the studios are only making those agreements with the big boys, Blockbuster, Netflix and Redbox while ignoring the little mom and pop stores. What is there to prevent them from going and buying a DVD and putting it up for rent?
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on November 25th, 2009 08:59 pm (UTC)
While I don't disagree with you, I CAN tell you that if someone does that, and the MPAA gets word of it, they would come after them HARD legally. I think it would probably be overkill doing it, but it would not surprise me. They will effectively create a black market for that sort of thing, with people seeking out mom and pop type places just for that purpose, if they go through with implementing this new release window. I guess we will just have to wait and see what happens.

Eddie
Cody B.: Osaka[info]codeman38 on November 26th, 2009 01:19 am (UTC)
I ended up renting a captioned version of Up through a mom-and-pop store after Disney's epic failure with that DVD. So yeah...
(Anonymous) on November 25th, 2009 09:02 pm (UTC)
Thanks for keeping us informed, Eddie.
Have a safe and blessed Thanksgiving.
Sarah (Speak Up Librarian)
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on November 26th, 2009 02:42 am (UTC)
Thank you, Sarah! You do the same as well!
Cody B.: get it together[info]codeman38 on November 26th, 2009 01:18 am (UTC)
I'd love it if there were a captioned theater that was actually a bus ride away from me. The closest one with captions is over a half hour out of town!
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on November 26th, 2009 02:41 am (UTC)
..... How lucky you are! The closest theater that offers captioned movies for me is a 6 HOUR roundtrip from me. Count your blessings. :-)

Eddie
Cody B.: Osaka[info]codeman38 on November 26th, 2009 02:45 am (UTC)
Oof. And I thought I had it bad.

Seriously, would it be too much to ask that every zip code with at least one theater should have captioned showings in one theater? Or something like that?
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on November 26th, 2009 03:39 am (UTC)
In Kentucky, there are 120 counties, and probably double that number of zip codes. Not reasonable. But we are currently working on trying to get more theaters accessible. Read some of my earlier blogs about attempted legislation here in Kentucky for an idea of what we are shooting for. I will have further updates as our movie study group progresses.
(Anonymous) on November 26th, 2009 10:14 pm (UTC)
This blows...
If everything goes via the black market...we'll all be left out...

Then again, in the black market we have foreigners who rely on captions too....they usually subtitle in English first before converting to another language...

-JJ