You are viewing [info]thumpaflash's journal

 
 
12 June 2009 @ 05:31 am
Captions For The Deaf, or More Money For The Rich?  

Folks:

As you all know, I've been fighting for more captioned movie access in Kentucky now for over a year.  Along the way, I've pointed out the varying ways in which Hollywood has attempted to dip their hands further into the American public's till by lobbying for greater tax incentives.  Well, a recently released statement by Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear has shown the pervasiveness of the Hollywood industry's reach.

Governor Beshear has called our state legislature back into a special session to address the almost $1 billion dollar shortfall, and proposed a plan that would boost economic tax incentives.  Included in that, is the creation of a Kentucky Film Commission, and a plan that would allow movie or film production companies to recoup as much as 20% of "qualified expenditures" for coming to Kentucky and filming documentaries, movies, TV shows, and the like.  One of the main arguments for proposing the increased incentives is that Kentucky currently ranks approximately 45th in the nation in incentives offered for filming, and that these low incentives are dragging us down.  According to this quote from the Deputy Secretary of the Kentucky Tourism, Arts and Heritage Cabinet:

"Kentucky ranks 45th in the country in the incentives it provides to the film industry, just above

those state's that offer no incentives at all, Deputy Secretary David Lovelace with the Kentucky

Tourism, Arts and Heritage Cabinet told the committee."


However, according to a recently released Motion Picture Association of America report detailing the MPAA's impact on the American economy, Kentucky actually ranks 31st (in 2007) in terms of wages paid by the motion picture and tv industry with $143,103,790.00!  This puts us ahead of such luminaries as Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Alaska in terms of money spent by these industries to film in our state.  So while it may be true that we are 45th in terms of incentives offered, we are actually 31st in terms of money gained from these industries.  I see very little reason at this time to offer incentives that would allegedly catapult us from 45th in incentives offered to 15th, especially when the most recent movie shot here was about Jefferson Davis..Remember that one?  Yeah, that is what I thought, I didn't see it either....Stop and think about that for a minute, they spent more money HERE, in little ol' Kentucky, than they did in HAWAII ($101,539,030.000).  You can read the report by the MPAA here:  http://www.mpaa.org/EconReportLo.pdf

Along the way, they (the MPAA) have spent approximately $55,000 lobbying over the past 12 months in Kentucky.  While I think it is commendable that the Governor is attempting to find ways to bring more money to the state, given that our state is in such a precarious position due to imbalances in the tax system, among other things, I think we can ill afford to spend $60,000 per day on a special session to implement a 185 page economic incentive plan (he is also asking for expanded gambling) that has at least one portion (film industry tax breaks) that has been shown to be hit or miss in terms of the return on investment.  Even the Legislative Research Commission has not been able to nail down exactly how much this would benefit the state (if it would at all).  There IS a sunset provision in the plan that would enable the incentive to die after 5 years if it is not shown to be a positive effect to the bottom line, but one wonders if we can ill afford to take a gamble for 5 years when we are in such a precarious budgetary position?

According to the MPAA's report, they have the largest positive trade imbalance of any industry, bringing in tremendous sums of money from foreign distributions with a relatively low output in terms of costs associated with exporting their wares.  I say, until the tv and film industry demonstrates more good faith in terms of working with their theater owner partners here in the US to be quicker in regards to providing more captioned products, we should be hesitant to offer them more public money.  Money that can be better spent on providing quality services in the form of better education, etc. 

Nice try, Governor...the effort is appreciated, but lets focus more on taking care of our citizens than doling out more tax breaks for an industry that saw an INCREASE in revenue in 2008.
 
 
( 6 comments — Leave a comment )
(Anonymous) on June 12th, 2009 03:51 pm (UTC)
You ought to fight this tax break and tie it to OC film bill
Eddie,

You and others ought to rattle the saber to raise such accessibility issue within mandatory requirement for open captioned films being available in neighborhood movie theatres across the state of Kentucky to ensure more options for deaf and hard of hearing and elderly and non-English-speaking and latened deaf individuals.

That is a GOOD CHANCE to tie the tax incentives proposal for filmaking expenses and location uses to the legalistive proposal for your crusade to bring OC (open captions) and RWC (I personally oppose it very much) on Kentucky movie screens!!

I will be more than glad to be of any help. :) I find the Hollywood filmmaking community to be patethically begging for tax incentives. Yea about their uneven film gross revenues to be questionable why we should give those people tax breaks?

The Bluegrass State would be better off than bucking down to the Hollywood filmakers.

The Mountain State (WV) doesn't give any kind of tax breaks for the Hollywood filmakings and still have the state budget surplus as compared to many states having budget shortfalls.

Robert L. Mason (RLM)
RLMDEAF blog
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on June 13th, 2009 03:57 am (UTC)
Re: You ought to fight this tax break and tie it to OC film bill
Robert:

First of all, thanks for commenting. We will be conducting a study group on this issue through the KCDHH, and I will be chairing the study group so that we can prepare for this legislation to be reintroduced in the 2010 regular session. We are unable to get any new legislation introduced through the special session that is being called by the Governor because HE sets the agenda on all special sessions, regular sessions, any bill can be considered. Additionally, the Governor's wife has been a major lobbying force for this type of tax credit since her husband was elected, so it will take the study group to focus on addressing all the concerns of legislators so they are better informed during the next session.

Secondly, I hate to be the one to tell you this, but your beloved West Virginia DOES offer tax incentives, and actually more than Kentucky does currently. West Virginia offers 27% transferable tax credits, and up to 31% if 10 or more West Virginians are used during production. They also offer something that I find a little crazy: if a river is used in the film or tv production, and it is desired, they will raise or lower the river by controlling the outflow from a dam! That is using public manpower! And there is no fee, but they (production company) have to apply ahead of time and work it out with the state first, they can't just call up and say "We need the river to be like a whitewater scene". You can read about it here: http://www.wvfilm.com/Incentives_for_Web/incentives.htm

Eddie
(Anonymous) on June 13th, 2009 05:20 am (UTC)
Re: WV Tax Incentives
Eddie,

I should check out the info about WV's tax breaks for the filmaking production before leaving the previous message.

Thanks for enclosing the info. 180 days in advance? Plz!

RLM
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on June 13th, 2009 05:30 am (UTC)
Re: WV Tax Incentives
Yes, they must begin production within 180 days of APPROVAL for these incentives. Basically, what they encourage is that anyone interested in shooting in WV contact them ahead of time to discuss the process, that way, paperwork is filled out in a timely manner, so they can ensure they begin production in time to receive the incentives. From what I can see, the WV incentives are more detailed than Kentucky's. But in the research I have been doing, the most detailed (and actually the one I could support easiest if I had to pick) is Tennessees' incentive plan. They have a tiered 13-15-17% plan that takes into account how many Tennessee citizens are hired to work, whether or not a company opens a headquarters in their state, etc. VERY detailed and easy to track and measure their return on investment. IF Kentucky had a plan like that, I might be more apt to get behind it, since I am not anti business, I'm just anti giving ANYONE tax breaks without a measurable return on investment.

Eddie
(Anonymous) on June 13th, 2009 05:49 pm (UTC)
Citizen Activism
Eddie,

Why not contact the statewide citizen activism group to help you out with organizing your messages and developing legislative clouts to force the filmaking community and MPAA to negoitate with you and others?

MPAA is a main obstacle to the widespread captionings on silver screen. It is a powerful lobbying group, too.

Why not some deaf people gather at the MPAA office in DC and have the week-long demonstration to make the MPAA look real bad for being insensitive to the deaf film buffs.

RLM
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on June 13th, 2009 08:15 pm (UTC)
Re: Citizen Activism
Because they really have no interest in meeting with us, nor negotiating with us. Right now, the best thing to do is meet with legislators and address their concerns regarding the legislation, and inform them. This is a VERY unknown issue in this state, to be honest, and they are simply not aware of the importance of it.

Believe me, I have had on-going negotiations/discussions with SEVERAL members of the cinematic and theater industries. If you will re-read some of my older posts on here, you will see the comments and discussions. PAy particular attention to the blog piece of mine titled "Busted".

One other thing, is that some of the email communiques between myself and a couple of them, I promised I would not divulge to the general public. I refuse to go back on my word unless they do so first. I believe in keeping my word. All have been fruitless because they keep wanting to debate off-topic issues instead of thinking outside the box. As for a demonstration at the MPAA offices in DC, that is really impractical right now due to economic reasons. Not a lot of people have the time or monetary means to travel up there for a week or even a couple of days, to do that, even as much as I would like to do so. We started gaining momentum towards the end of the last legislative session, but it happened too quickly (it was only a 30 day session, which is the norm for odd numbered years. Even numbered years are 60 days, which leaves us more time to lobby). Now, if some people up there in the Northern Virginia/DC area want to demonstrate on the MPAA, I have no control over that. I only hope that they do so in a peaceful and organized manner should they decide to do that. Otherwise, my goal right now is focused on gathering information and numbers, and addressing concerns and trying to come up with compromises that are agreeable to both sides.

Eddie