Home

Advertisement

Customize
 
 
28 January 2009 @ 08:53 am
Do the Hearing Really Mind Captions?  
Not if you believe the results of this independent survey conducted on behalf of CaptionsON.  I found this information on their website and am pasting it here for all to see:

In February 2008, a non-compensated online survey was conducted by Decision Analyst, Inc., on behalf CaptionsON. 

The purpose of the research was to ascertain current attitudes toward, and usage of, closed captioning from a national perspective in order to enhance the design of the campaign. In order to obtain a more substantive profile of the respondents, questions regarding viewing patterns were included in the survey vehicle as well as standard demographic information.

Key Findings:

  • Eight in ten TV viewers have been exposed to captions.
  • 50% of those exposed to captions proactively turn captions on some percent of their viewing time.
  • Less than 1/5 of them have seen captions online (17%).
  • Less than 1/3 of them report having seen captions in TV advertising (31%).
  • 70% of those who never use captions said they would turn on captions if they knew about all the benefits of captions. Among those who are under 45 the percentage jumps to 81%.
  • But unfortunately 47% of those who responded, when asked if they were unhappy with the quality of captions, said “yes.” And 45% of that group said that they change the channel/turn the program off when they are unhappy with the captions.

About the Sample:

The demographics of the respondents closely parallel U.S. Census estimates of the population:

Gender:

  • 49% Men
  • 51% Women

Marital Status:

  • 54% Married
  • 23% Single
  • 15% Divorced/Widowed
  • 8% Living with Partner

Age:

  • 8% (18 – 24)
  • 20% (25 – 34)
  • 21% (35 – 44)
  • 11% (45 – 49)
  • 10% (50 – 54)
  • 14% (55 – 64)
  • 16% (65+) 

Residence by regions of the country:

  • 19% Northeast
  • 22% Midwest
  • 36% South
  • 22% West

Income levels (annual/total household):

  • 24% (Under $25,000)
  • 11% ($25,000 - $34,900)
  • 14% ($35,000 - $49,900)
  • 9% ($50,000 - $59,000)
  • 11% ($60,000 - $74,900)
  • 14% ($75,000 - $99,900)
  • 17% (Over $100,000)

The sample provided a close analog of the U.S. audience for television programming:

  • 97% watch televised entertainment in a typical week.
  • 94% watch news programming in a typical week.
  • 74% report watching televised sporting events in a typical week.

20% of households include someone who is deaf/hard of hearing or has some difficulty hearing.

26% of households include someone who is impacted by captioning:

  • children/adults learning to read
  • an individual(s) learning English as a second language
  • someone acting as a caregiver to an elderly relative or individual requiring assisted care

Of particular interest to me, was the finding that 70% of respondents said they would turn captions on if they knew all the benefits of captions, and that number jumps to 81% in the under 45 years of age market.  Why is this so interesting?  Because the under 45 age market is the primary driver of the cinema consumer market.  And before anyone thinks this survey was driven by the deaf or hard of hearing, please note that only 20% of the households of the respondents had someone who is deaf/hard of hearing or has some difficulty hearing.

Clearly the attitudes, like the times, they are a'changing.  The constant argument of the cinema industry that hearing audiences don't like to attend Open Captioned movies is looking somewhat rebutted by this survey.  Don't get me wrong, I understand it is not a survey of the majority of the population, but it DOES support what I have heard from many deaf people who have asked other hearing people what they thought, and it supports what hearing people have told me personally.  The most important thing to note here, is that these kinds of numbers are generated after educating or showing the hearing populance of the benefits of captioning.  I've said it countless times, EDUCATION IS THE KEY to coming to a common understanding and agreement in the pursuit of better access for the deaf and hard of hearing at the movies and in other media formats (such as online captions of web videos).  It is nice to see that more research is becoming available as of late in support of captions.  While this information pertains to television viewing, a very reasonable argument can be made that the majority of the numbers would transalate to the cinema viewing experience.  And since the movie industry (both studios and theaters alike) either can't or won't make their alleged numbers and the method of sampling public, I believe it safe to say at this point that their arguments about the hearing audience not liking captions is unsubstantiated or flawed in it's gathering.

As I said at the beginning of this piece, this information was gathered from the CaptionsON website.  For more information, please visit their site at: 


http://captionson.com/capsMatter_research.asp


Eddie
 
 
( 4 comments — Post a new comment )
(Anonymous) on January 28th, 2009 06:48 pm (UTC)
We find the survey similar in the UK, many do not mind captions at all, perhaps the world is very noisy ! However we found there was a lot of resistance to signing on screen, most hearing wanted a turn them off option, which we have with captions here (888), as yet there is no turn off option for signed access, so hearing are annoyed ! So much so, a number lobbied a SKY news program here and had the signer removed, or they threatened SKY with a mass turn off of hearing viewers, SKY caved in straight away.
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on January 29th, 2009 01:23 pm (UTC)
So, in the UK, you have both captions, and the signer in a box in the corner of the screen?

As much as I dislike what they did (the hearing viewers), it DOES show that businesses will listen to a united, unified voice on important issues. That is one of the reasons I spend so much time trying to educate people about different aspects of the caption fight here against the film industry. The more people know, the easier it is to get them unified on an issue. Thanks for commenting, nice to know I got at least one reader across the pond! Ha

Eddie
(Anonymous) on January 29th, 2009 07:34 pm (UTC)
That aint the half of it thumpaflash. On some programs we can get signed presenters, with a signer in the corner and captions. Then we can get a News program like SKY (Who have this very irritating moving 'banner' approach across the screens all the time), WITH background text, in-vision video, and a signer, and captions, it is so bad I can't watch it, terrific conflict of images and access, makes it unviewable for deaf, silly really. In-vision Signing is a biggie, it is direct conflict of images, and hearing do NOT like it, because they aren't deaf and cannot separate the access. We actually find signing and captions together are conflict as well, with the deaf. We want one or the other. NOT both !
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on January 29th, 2009 08:02 pm (UTC)
Fascinating....I always thought it was one or the other anyway over there.. Given the deaf proclivity for reliance on visuals, that WOULD seem like a mess to try and sort through, especially if the captions or the signer(s) are "off" even just a bit...

Eddie
 
 

Advertisement

Customize